https://www.pria.org/https://ula.kemendagri.go.id/https://fkip.unsulbar.ac.id/https://rskiasawojajar.co.id/https://satvika.co.id/https://lpmpp.unib.ac.id/https://cefta.int/https://terc.lpem.org/http://ebphtb.linggakab.go.id/https://eproc.jawapos.co.id/https://lppm.unika.ac.id/https://indolivestock.com/https://dompetalquran.or.id/
Art in the EU

Art in the EU

20/11/2019

Karolina Blasiak, Art Advisor, takes stock of Art regulation in EU for Dock Wall magazine.This article is part of our monthly Art Advisory newsletter. If you want to receive it, please contact Karolina Blasiak.

On June 7, EU Regulation 2019/880 became official. The regulation severely limits the import of ancient art, books, manuscripts, and antiques into the European Union. The regulation took two years to come to fruition, but won’t be fully in effect until 2024–2026, when it will act as a de facto ban of the import of antiquities in 28 EU nations. The law was enacted in an effort to combat looting in unstable or war-torn countries.


The regulation restricts import and export of items that are more than 200 years old. To pass through, there must be documentation of lawful export from the source country. If that’s not possible, the exporter must provide documentation from a second country where the item has resided for at least five years. It’s theorized that auction houses, small art galleries, and legitimate traders will be hurt the most. Already, these businesses are subject to other import and export regulations.


Karolina Blasiak, an art advisor for Rosemont International, says the regulation was specifically drawn up in an attempt to stop illicit trafficking of antiquities — a perceived source of income for terrorists and organized crime groups. “For the superyacht industry, as well as for the transport companies, this will increase the administrative burden on what are mostly small and medium-sized businesses but, more worryingly, the regulation will prevent the import of many archaeological and historic artefacts that are legitimately circulating on the art and antiques market,” she says, pointing out that legal sanctions were already in place to protect at-risk countries and could simply have been extended.
“Instead, the EU has delivered a considerable blow to the legitimate art market while adding to its own financial and administrative burdens,” she says.

The antiquities trade is particularly concerned about the evidence that the EU now requires. All EU countries are expected to adopt implementing acts within two years — the regulation can only be implemented through an online application system. To become fully operational, a unified electronic system for requesting import licenses must be in place. Once that’s done, the electronic system must be complete within four years — by 2026 at the latest — which is why the import licensing requirement will be deferred until 2024 or 2026. Then, the custom laws across the EU will be harmonized and ready for the online system.

A major concern is if this can work as hoped. Blasiak says that in many cases (if not most), it will likely prove to be impossible to provide proof of past legal export due to several factors: how far back in time the original export might have taken place, the difficulty in identifying when that was, “and the likelihood that no information exists on what relevant laws applied at the time and the almost certain lack of paperwork.”

The art trade in affected regions have conducted and submitted evidence based on police and World Customs Organization data. Unfortunately, the EU Parliament has proceeded with the final regulations before waiting on the results oftheir own commissioned study — a 2017 “Study on improving knowledge about illicit trade in cultural goods in the EU, and the new technologies available to combat it.” Results are still not in. 


Article origigaly published on Dockwall Magazine.
Credit Pictures: Water for the Soul, Fiona Tan, 1x2m, 2017 - Acrylic, varnish and glitter powder on an ultrachrome print on canva